OAR 340-230-0340: Municipal Waste Combustors: Monitoring and Testing

(1) The standards under OAR 340-230-0300 through 0359 apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Duration of startup, shutdown, or malfunction periods are limited to 3 hours per occurrence, except as provided in subsection (1)(c) of this rule. During periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction, monitoring data must be dismissed or excluded from compliance calculations, but must be recorded and reported in accordance with the provisions of OAR 340-230-0350(1)(f). (a) The startup period commences when the affected facility begins the continuous burning of municipal solid waste and does not include any warmup period when the affected facility is combusting fossil fuel or other non municipal solid waste fuel, and no municipal solid waste is being fed to the combustor. (b) Continuous burning is the continuous, semicontinuous, or batch feeding of municipal solid waste for purposes of waste disposal, energy production, or providing heat to the combustion system in preparation for waste disposal or energy production. The use of municipal solid waste solely to provide thermal protection of the grate or hearth during the startup period when municipal solid waste is not being fed to the grate is not considered to be continuous burning. (c) For purposes of compliance with the carbon monoxide emissions limit in OAR 340-230-320(1), if a loss of boiler water level control (e.g., boiler waterwall tube failure) or a loss of combustion air control (e.g., loss of combustion air fan, induced draft fan, combustion grate bar failure) is determined to be a malfunction, the duration of the malfunction period is limited to 15 hours per occurrence. During such periods of malfunction, monitoring data must be dismissed or excluded from compliance calculations, but must be recorded and reported in accordance with the provisions of OAR 340-230-0350(1)(f). (2) The owner or operator of an affected facility must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for measuring the oxygen or carbon dioxide content of the flue gas at each location where carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen oxides emissions, or particulate matter (if the owner or operator elects to continuously monitor emissions under section (13) of this rule) are monitored and record the output of the system and must comply with the test procedures and test methods specified in subsections (2)(a) through (g) of this rule. (a) The span value of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) monitor must be 25 percent oxygen (or 20 percent carbon dioxide). (b) The monitor must be installed, evaluated, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.13. (c) The monitor must conform to Performance Specification 3 in appendix B of 40 CFR 60 except for section 2.3 (relative accuracy requirement). (d) The quality assurance procedures of Appendix F of 40 CFR 60 except for section 5.1.1 (relative accuracy test audit) shall apply to the monitor. (e) If carbon dioxide is selected for use in diluent corrections, the relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels must be established during the initial performance test according to the following procedures and methods specified in paragraphs (2)(e)(A) through (D) of this rule. This relationship may be reestablished during subsequent performance compliance tests. (A) The fuel factor equation in Method 3B must be used to determine the relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide at a sampling location. EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used to determine the oxygen concentration at the same location as the carbon dioxide monitor. (B) Samples must be taken for at least 30 minutes in each hour. (C) Each sample must represent a 1-hour average. (D) A minimum of three runs must be performed. (f) The relationship between carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations that is established in accordance with subsection (2)(e) of this rule must be submitted to the Department as part of the annual performance test report if the relationship is reestablished during the annual performance test. (g) During a loss of boiler water level control or loss of combustion air control malfunction period as specified in subsection (1)(c) of this rule, a diluent cap of 14 percent for oxygen or 5 percent for carbon dioxide may be used in the emissions calculations for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. (3) Except as provided in subsection (3)(i) of this rule, the procedures and test methods specified in subsections (3)(a) through (j) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the emission limits for particulate matter and opacity under OAR 340-230-0310(1) and (2). (a) EPA Reference Method 1 must be used to select sampling site and number of traverse points. (b) EPA Reference Method 3, 3A or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used for gas analysis. (c) EPA Reference Method 5 must be used for determining compliance with the particulate matter emission limit. The minimum sample volume must be 1.7 cubic meters (60 cubic feet). The probe and filter holder heating systems in the sample train must be set to provide a gas temperature no greater than 160°C (320°F). An oxygen or carbon dioxide measurement must be obtained simultaneously with each EPA Reference Method 5 run. (d) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the particulate matter emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (e) As specified under 40 CFR 60.8, all performance tests must consist of at least three test runs. The average of the particulate matter emission concentrations from the three test runs is used to determine compliance. (f) In accordance with subsections (3)(g) and (j) of this rule, EPA Reference Method 9 must be used for determining compliance with the opacity limit except as provided under 40 CFR 60.11(e). (g) The owner or operator of an affected facility must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system for measuring opacity and must follow the methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (3)(g)(A) through (C) of this rule. (A) The output of the continuous opacity monitoring system must be recorded on a 6-minute average basis. (B) The continuous opacity monitoring system must be installed, evaluated, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.13. (C) The continuous opacity monitoring system must conform to Performance Specification 1 in Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60. (h) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct a performance test for particulate matter on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period). (i) In place of particulate matter testing with EPA Reference Method 5, an owner or operator may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for monitoring particulate matter emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system. The owner or operator of an affected facility who elects to continuously monitor particulate matter emissions instead of conducting performance testing using EPA Reference Method 5 must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system and must comply with the requirements specified in paragraphs (3)(i)(A) through (N) of this rule. The owner or operator who elects to continuously monitor particulate matter emissions instead of conducting performance testing using EPA Reference Method 5 is not required to complete performance testing for particulate matter as specified in subsection (3)(h) of this rule and is not required to continuously monitor opacity as specified in subsection (3)(g) of this rule. (A) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before starting use of the system. (B) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before stopping use of the system. (C) The monitor must be installed, evaluated, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.13. (D) The initial performance evaluation must be completed no later than 180 days of notification to the Administrator and the Department of use of the continuous monitoring system if the owner or operator was previously determining compliance by Method 5 performance tests, whichever is later. (E) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the particulate matter emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (F) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct an initial performance test for particulate matter emissions as required under 40 CFR 60.8. Compliance with the particulate matter emission limit must be determined by using the continuous emission monitoring system specified in subsection (3)(i) of this rule to measure particulate matter and calculating a 24-hour block arithmetic average emission concentration using EPA Reference Method 19, section 12.4.1. (G) Compliance with the particulate matter emission limit must be determined based on the 24-hour daily (block) average of the hourly arithmetic average emission concentrations using continuous emission monitoring system outlet data. (H) At a minimum, valid continuous monitoring system hourly averages must be obtained as specified in subparagraphs (3)(i)(H)(i) and (ii) of this rule for at least 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (i) At least two data points per hour must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (ii) Each particulate matter 1-hour arithmetic average must be corrected to 7 percent oxygen on an hourly basis using the 1-hour arithmetic average of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system data. (I) The 1-hour arithmetic averages required under paragraph (3)(i)(G) of this rule must be expressed in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis) and must be used to calculate the 24-hour daily arithmetic average emission concentrations. The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be calculated using the data points required under 40 CFR 60.13(e)(2). (J) All valid continuous emission monitoring system data must be used in calculating average emission concentrations even if the minimum continuous emission monitoring system data requirements of paragraph (3)(i)(H) of this rule are not met. (K) The continuous emission monitoring system must be operated according to Performance Specification 11 in 40 CFR part 60 appendix B. (L) During each relative accuracy test run of the continuous emission monitoring system required by Performance Specification 11 in 40 CFR part 60 appendix B, particulate matter and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) data must be collected concurrently (or within a 30- to 60-minute period) by both the continuous emission monitors and the test methods specified in subparagraphs (3)(i)(L)(i) and (ii) of this rule. (i) For particulate matter, EPA Reference Method 5 must be used. (ii) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, as applicable must be used. (M) Quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration drift tests must be performed in accordance with Procedure 2 in 40 CFR part 60 appendix F. (N) When particulate matter emissions data are not obtained because of continuous emission monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, emissions data must be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by the Administrator or EPA Reference Method 19 to provide, as necessary, valid emissions data for a minimum of 90 percent of the hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the hours per calendar year that the affected facility is operated and combusting municipal solid waste. (j) For each affected facility, the owner or operator must conduct a performance test for opacity on an annual basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period) using the test method specified in subsection (3)(f) of this rule. (4) The procedures and test methods specified in subsections (4)(a) and (b) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the emission limits for cadmium, lead, and mercury under OAR 340-230-0310(3). (a) The procedures and test methods specified in paragraphs (4)(a)(A) through (G) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the emission limits for cadmium and lead under OAR 340-230-0310(3)(a) and (b). (A) EPA Reference Method 1 must be used for determining the location and number of sampling points. (B) EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used for flue gas analysis. (C) EPA Reference Method 29 must be used for determining compliance with the cadmium and lead emission limits. (D) An oxygen or carbon dioxide measurement must be obtained simultaneously with each EPA Reference Method 29 test run for cadmium and lead required under paragraph (4)(a)(C) of this rule. (E) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the cadmium or lead emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (F) All performance tests must consist of at least three test runs conducted under representative full load operating conditions. The average of the cadmium and lead emission concentrations from three test runs or more must be used to determine compliance. (G) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct a performance test for compliance with the emission limits for cadmium and lead on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period). (b) The procedures and test methods specified in paragraphs (4)(b)(A) through (I) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the mercury emission limit under OAR 340-230-0310(3)(c). (A) EPA Reference Method 1 must be used for determining the location and number of sampling points. (B) EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used for flue gas analysis. (C) EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 must be used to determine the mercury emission concentration. The minimum sample volume when using EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 for mercury is 1.7 cubic meters (60 cubic feet). (D) An oxygen (or carbon dioxide) measurement must be obtained simultaneously with each EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 test run for mercury required under paragraph (4)(b)(C) of this rule. (E) The percent reduction in the potential mercury emissions (%PHg) is computed using equation 1: [Equation not included. See NOTE.] (F) All performance tests must consist of a minimum of three test runs conducted under representative full load operating conditions. The average of the mercury emission concentrations or percent reductions from three test runs or more is used to determine compliance. (G) The owner or operator of an affected source may request that compliance with the mercury emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (H) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct a performance test for mercury emissions on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months from the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period). (I) The owner or operator of an affected facility where activated carbon injection is used to comply with the mercury emission limit must follow the procedures specified in section (12) of this rule for measuring and calculating carbon usage. (c) In place of cadmium and lead testing with EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02, an owner or operator may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for monitoring cadmium and lead emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system according to the provisions of sections (13) and (14) of this rule. (d) In place of mercury testing with EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02, an owner or operator may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system or a continuous automated sampling system for monitoring mercury emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system according to the provisions of sections (13) and (14) of this rule, or sections (15) and (16) of this rule, as appropriate. The owner or operator who elects to continuously monitor mercury in place of mercury testing with EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 is not required to complete performance testing for mercury as specified in paragraph (4)(b)(H) of this rule. (5) The procedures and test methods specified in subsections (5)(a) through (l) of this rule must be used for determining compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limit under OAR 340-230-0310(4). (a) EPA Reference Method 19, section 4.3, must be used to calculate the daily geometric average sulfur dioxide emission concentration. (b) EPA Reference Method 19, section 5.4, must be used to determine the daily geometric average percent reduction in the potential sulfur dioxide emission concentration. (c) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (d) Compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limit (concentration or percent reduction) must be determined by using the continuous emission monitoring system specified in subsection (5)(e) of this rule to measure sulfur dioxide and calculating 24-hour daily geometric average emission concentration or a 24-hour daily geometric average percent reduction using EPA reference Method 19, sections 4.3 and 5.4, as applicable. (e) The owner or operator of an affected facility must install, evaluate, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system in accordance with 40 CFR 60.13. (f) Compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limit must be determined based on the 24-hour daily geometric average of the hourly arithmetic average emission concentrations using continuous emission monitoring system outlet data if compliance is based on an emission concentration, or continuous emission monitoring system inlet and outlet data if compliance is based on a percent reduction. (g) At a minimum, valid continuous monitoring system hourly averages must be obtained as specified in paragraphs (5)(g)(A) and (B) of this rule for 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (A) At least two data points per hour must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (B) Each sulfur dioxide 1-hour arithmetic average must be corrected to 7 percent oxygen on an hourly basis using the 1-hour arithmetic average of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system data. (h) The 1-hour arithmetic averages required under subsection (5)(f) of this rule must be expressed in parts per million corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis) and used to calculate the 24-hour daily geometric average emission concentrations and daily geometric average emission percent reductions. The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be calculated using the data points required under 40 CFR 60.13(e)(2). (i) All valid continuous emission monitoring system data must be used in calculating average emission concentrations and percent reductions even if the minimum continuous emission monitoring system data requirements of subsection (5)(g) of this rule are not met. (j) The continuous emission monitoring system must be operated according to Performance Specification 2 in appendix B of 40 CFR 60. For sources that have actual inlet emissions less than 100 parts per million dry volume, the relative accuracy criterion for inlet sulfur dioxide continuous emission monitoring systems should be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the reference method test data in terms of the units of the emission standard, or 5 parts per million dry volume absolute value of the mean difference between the reference method and the continuous emission monitoring systems, whichever is greater. (A) During each relative accuracy test run of the continuous emission monitoring system required by Performance Specification 2 in appendix B of 40 CFR 60, sulfur dioxide and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) must be collected concurrently (or within a 30- to 60-minute period) by both the continuous emission monitors and the test methods specified in subparagraphs (5)(j)(A)(i) and (ii) of this rule. (i) For sulfur dioxide, EPA Reference Method 6, 6A, or 6C, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, must be used. (ii) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, must be used. (B) The span value of the continuous emissions monitoring system at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device must be 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential sulfur dioxide emissions of the municipal waste combustor unit. The span value of the continuous emission monitoring system at the outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device must be 50 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential sulfur dioxide emissions of the municipal waste combustor unit. (k) Quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration tests must be performed in accordance with Procedure 1 in Appendix F of 40 CFR 60. (l) When sulfur dioxide emissions data are not obtained because of continuous emission monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and/or zero and span adjustments, emissions data must be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by the Department or EPA Reference Method 19 to provide, as necessary, valid emissions data for a minimum of 90 percent of the hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the hours per calendar year that the affected facility is operated and combusting municipal solid waste. (6) The procedures and test methods specified in subsections (6)(a) through (h) if this rule must be used for determining compliance with the hydrogen chloride emission limit under OAR 340-230-0310(5). (a) EPA Reference Method 26 or 26A, as applicable, must be used to determine the hydrogen chloride emission concentration. The minimum sampling time for must be 1 hour. (b) An oxygen (or carbon dioxide) measurement must be obtained simultaneously with each test run for hydrogen chloride required by subsection (6)(a) of this rule. (c) The percent reduction in potential hydrogen chloride emissions (% PHCl) is computed using equation 2: [Equation not included. See ED. NOTE.] (d) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the hydrogen chloride emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (e) As specified under 40 CFR 60.8, all performance tests must consist of three test runs. The average of the hydrogen chloride emission concentrations from the three test runs is used to determine compliance. (f) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct a performance test for hydrogen chloride emissions on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period). (g) In place of hydrogen chloride testing with EPA Reference Method 26 or 26A, an owner or operator may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for monitoring hydrogen chloride emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system according to the provisions of sections (13) and (14) of this rule. (7) The procedures and test methods specified in subsections (7)(a) through (h) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the limits for dioxin/furan emissions under OAR 340-230-0310(6). (a) EPA Reference Method 1 must be used for determining the location and number of sampling points. (b) EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used for flue gas analysis. (c) EPA Reference Method 23 must be used for determining the dioxin/furan emission concentration. (A) The minimum sample time must be 4 hours per test run. (B) An oxygen (or carbon dioxide) measurement must be obtained simultaneously with each EPA Reference Method 23 test run for dioxins/furans. (d) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct performance tests for dioxin/furan emissions in accordance with subsection (7)(c) of this rule, according to one of the schedules specified in paragraphs (7)(d)(A) through (C) of this rule. (A) Performance tests must be conducted on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period). (B) For the purpose of evaluating system performance to establish new operating parameter levels, testing new technology or control technologies, diagnostic testing, or related activities for the purpose of improving facility performance or advancing the state-of-the-art for controlling facility emissions, the owner or operator of an affected facility that qualifies for the performance testing schedule specified in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule, may test one unit for dioxin/furan and apply the dioxin/furan operating parameters to similarly designed and equipped units on site by meeting the requirements specified in subparagraphs (7)(d)(B)(i) through (iv) of this rule. (i) Follow the testing schedule established in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule. For example, each year a different affected facility at the municipal waste combustor plant must be tested, and the affected facilities at the plant must be tested in sequence (e.g., unit 1, unit 2, unit 3, as applicable). (ii) Where such units use carbon to meet the applicable dioxin/furan emission limit, upon meeting the requirements in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule for one affected facility, the owner or operator may elect to apply the average carbon mass feed rate and associated carbon injection system operating parameter levels for dioxin/furan as established in section (13) of this rule to similarly designed and equipped units on site. (iii) Upon testing each subsequent unit in accordance with the testing schedule established in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule, the dioxin/furan and mercury emissions of the subsequent unit must not exceed the dioxin/furan and mercury emissions measured in the most recent test of that unit prior to the revised operating parameter levels. (iv) The owner or operator of an affected facility that selects to follow the performance testing schedule specified in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule and apply the carbon injection system operating parameters to similarly designed and equipped units on site must follow the procedures specified in OAR 340-230-0350(3)(d) for reporting. (C) Where all performance tests over a 2-year period indicate that dioxin/furan emissions are less than or equal to 7 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (total mass) for all affected facilities located within a municipal waste combustor plant, the owner or operator of the municipal waste combustor plant may elect to conduct annual performance tests for one affected facility (i.e., unit) per year at the municipal waste combustor plant. At a minimum, a performance test for dioxin/furan emissions must be conducted on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year calendar period) for one affected facility at the municipal waste combustor plant. Each year a different affected facility at the municipal waste combustor plant must be tested, and the affected facilities at the plant must be tested in sequence (e.g., unit 1, unit 2, unit 3, as applicable). If each annual performance test continues to indicate a dioxin/furan emission level less than or equal to 7 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (total mass), the owner or operator may continue conducting a performance test on only one affected facility per year. If any annual performance test indicates either a dioxin/furan emission level greater than 7 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (total mass), performance tests thereafter must be conducted annually on all affected facilities at the plant until and unless all annual performance tests for all affected facilities at the plant over a 2-year period indicate a dioxin/furan emission level less than or equal to 7 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (total mass). (e) The owner or operator of an affected facility that selects to follow the performance testing schedule specified in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule must follow the procedures specified in OAR 340-230-0350(3)(d) for reporting the selection of this schedule. (f) The owner or operator of an affected facility where activated carbon is used must follow the procedures specified in section (12) of this rule for measuring and calculating the carbon usage rate. (g) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (h) As specified under 40 CFR 60.8, all performance tests must consist of three test runs. The average of the dioxin/furan emission concentrations from the three test runs is used to determine compliance. (i) In place of dioxin/furan sampling and testing with EPA Reference Method 23, an owner or operator may elect to sample dioxin/furan by installing, calibrating, maintaining, and operating a continuous automated sampling system for monitoring dioxin/furan emissions discharged to the atmosphere, recording the output of the system, and analyzing the sample using EPA Reference Method 23. This option to use a continuous automated sampling system takes effect on the date a final performance specification applicable to dioxin/furan from monitors is published in the Federal Register or the date of approval of a site-specific monitoring plan. The owner or operator of an affected facility who elects to continuously sample dioxin/furan emissions instead of sampling and testing using EPA Reference Method 23 must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous automated sampling system and must comply with the requirements specified in sections (15) and (16) of this rule. (8) The procedures and test methods specified in subsections (8)(a) through (i) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limit for affected facilities. (a) Compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limit must be determined by using the continuous emission monitoring system specified in subsection (8)(c) of this rule for measuring nitrogen oxides and calculating a 24-hour daily arithmetic average emission concentration using EPA Reference Method 19, section 4.1. (b) An owner or operator may request that compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (c) The owner or operator of an affected facility must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for measuring nitrogen oxides discharged to the atmosphere, and record the output of the system. (d) At a minimum, valid continuous emission monitoring system hourly averages must be obtained as specified in paragraphs (8)(d)(A) and (B) of this rule for 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and for 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (A) At least 2 data points per hour must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (B) Each nitrogen oxides 1-hour arithmetic average must be corrected to 7 percent oxygen on an hourly basis using the 1-hour arithmetic average of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system data. (e) The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be expressed in parts per million by volume (dry basis) and used to calculate the 24-hour daily arithmetic average concentrations. The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be calculated using the data points required under 40 CFR 60.13(e)(2). (f) All valid continuous emission monitoring system data must be used in calculating emission averages even if the minimum continuous emission monitoring system data requirements of subsection (8)(d) of this rule are not met. (g) The owner or operator of an affected facility must operate the continuous emission monitoring system according to Performance Specification 2 in Appendix B of 40 CFR 60 and must follow the procedures and methods specified in paragraphs (8)(g)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) During each relative accuracy test run of the continuous emission monitoring system required by Performance Specification 2 in Appendix B of 40 CFR 60, nitrogen oxides and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) must be collected concurrently (or within a 30- to 60-minute period) by both the continuous emission monitors and the test methods specified in subparagraphs (8)(g)(A)(i) and (ii) of this rule. (i) For nitrogen oxides, EPA Reference Methods 7, 7A, 7C, 7D, or 7E must be used. (ii) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or as an alternative ASME PTC-19-10-1981-Part 10, as applicable, must be used. (B) The span value of the continuous emission monitoring system must be 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential nitrogen oxide emissions of the municipal waste combustor unit. (h) Quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration drift tests must be performed in accordance with Procedure 1 in Appendix F of 40 CFR Part 60. (i) When nitrogen oxides continuous emissions data are not obtained because of continuous emission monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, emissions data must be obtained using other monitoring systems as approved by the Department or EPA Reference Method 19 to provide, as necessary, valid emissions data for a minimum of 90 percent of the hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the hours per calendar year the unit is operated and combusting municipal solid waste. (9) The procedures specified in subsections (9)(a) through (k) of this rule must be used for determining compliance with the operating requirements under OAR 340-230-0320. (a) Compliance with the carbon monoxide emission limits in OAR 340-230-0320(1) must be determined using a 4-hour block arithmetic average. (b) The owner or operator of an affected facility must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for measuring carbon monoxide at the combustor outlet and record the output of the system and must follow the procedures and methods specified in paragraphs (9)(a)(A) through (C) of this rule: (A) The continuous emission monitoring system must be operated according to Performance Specification 4A in Appendix B of 40 CFR 60. (B) During each relative accuracy test run of the continuous emission monitoring system required by Performance Specification 4A in Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60, carbon monoxide and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) data must be collected concurrently (or within a 30- to 60-minute period) by both the continuous emission monitors and the test methods specified in subparagraphs (9)(b)(B)(i) and (ii) of this rule. For affected facilities subject to the 100 parts per million dry volume carbon monoxide standard, the relative accuracy criterion of 5 parts per million dry volume is calculated as the absolute value of the mean difference between the reference method and continuous emission monitoring systems. (i) For carbon monoxide, EPA Reference Methods 10, 10A, or 10B must be used. (ii) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, or ASME PTC-19-10-1981--Part 10 (incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17), as applicable, must be used. (C) The span value of the continuous emission monitoring system must be 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential carbon monoxide emissions of the municipal waste combustor unit. (c) The 4-hour block daily arithmetic averages specified in subsection (9)(a) of this rule must be calculated from 1-hour arithmetic averages expressed in parts per million by volume corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis). The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be calculated using the data points generated by the continuous emission monitoring system. At least two data points must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (d) The owner or operator of an affected facility may request that compliance with the carbon monoxide emission limit be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (e) The procedures specified in paragraphs (9)(e)(A) through (D) of this rule must be used to determine compliance with load level requirements under OAR 340-230-0320(2). (A) The owner or operator of an affected facility with steam generation capability must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a steam flow meter or a feedwater flow meter; measure steam (or feedwater) flow in kilograms per hour (or pounds per hour) on a continuous basis; and record the output of the monitor. Steam (or feedwater) flow must be calculated in 4-hour block arithmetic averages. (B) The method included in the "American Society of Mechanical Engineers Power Test Codes: Test Code for Steam Generating Units, Power Test Code 4.1—1964 (R1991)" section 4 (incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17) must be used for calculating the steam (or feedwater) flow required under paragraph (9)(c)(A) of this rule. The recommendations in "American Society of Mechanical Engineers Interim Supplement 19.5 on Instruments and Apparatus: Application, Part II of Fluid Meters, 6th edition (1971)," chapter 4 (incorporated by reference -- see 40 CFR 60.17) must be followed for design, construction, installation, calibration, and use of nozzles and orifices except as specified in paragraph (9)(e)(C) of this rule: (C) Measurement devices such as flow nozzles and orifices are not required to be recalibrated after they are installed. (D) All signal conversion elements associated with steam (or feedwater flow) measurements must be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions before each dioxin/furan performance test, and at least once per year. (f) To determine compliance with the maximum particulate matter control device temperature requirements under OAR 340-230-0320(3), the owner or operator of an affected facility must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a device for measuring on a continuous basis the temperature of the flue gas stream at the inlet to each particulate matter control device utilized by the affected facility. Temperature must be calculated in 4-hour block arithmetic averages. (g) The maximum demonstrated municipal waste combustor unit load must be determined during the initial performance test for dioxins/furans and each subsequent performance test during which compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit specified in OAR 340-230-0310(6) is achieved. The maximum demonstrated municipal waste combustor unit load shall be the highest 4-hour arithmetic average load achieved during four consecutive hours during the most recent test during which compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit was achieved. If a subsequent dioxin/furan performance test is being performed on only one affected facility at the MWC plant, as provided in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule, the owner or operator may elect to apply the same maximum municipal waste combustor unit load from the tested facility for all the similarly designed and operated affected facilities at the MWC plant. (h) For each particulate matter control device employed at the affected facility, the maximum demonstrated particulate matter control device temperature must be determined during each performance test during which compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit specified in OAR 340-230-0310(6) is achieved. The maximum demonstrated particulate matter control device temperature shall be the highest 4-hour arithmetic average temperature achieved at the particulate matter control device inlet during four consecutive hours during the most recent test during which compliance with the dioxin/furan limit was achieved. If a subsequent dioxin/furan performance test is being performed on only one affected facility at the MWC plant, as provided in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule, the owner or operator may elect to apply the same maximum particulate matter control device temperature from the tested facility for all the similarly designed and operated affected facilities at the MWC plant. (i) At a minimum, valid continuous emission monitoring system hourly averages must be obtained as specified in paragraphs (9)(i)(A) and (B) of this rule for at least 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (A) At least two data points per hour must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (B) At a minimum, each carbon monoxide 1-hour arithmetic must be corrected to 7-percent oxygen on an hourly basis using the 1-hour arithmetic average of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system data. (j) All valid continuous emission monitoring system data must be used in calculating the parameters specified under section (9) of this rule even if the minimum data requirements of subsection (9)(i) of this rule are not met. When carbon monoxide continuous emission data are not obtained because of continuous emission monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, emissions data must be obtained using other monitoring systems as approved by the Department or EPA Reference Method 10 to provide, as necessary, the minimum valid emission data. (k) Quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration drift tests for the carbon monoxide continuous emission monitoring system must be performed in accordance with Procedure 1 in appendix F of 40 CFR part 60. (10) The procedures specified in subsections (10)(a) an (b) of this rule must be used for calculating municipal waste combustor unit capacity as defined by 40 CFR 60.51b. (a) For municipal waste combustor units capable of combusting municipal solid waste continuously for a 24-hour period, municipal waste combustor unit capacity must be calculated based on 24 hours of operation at the maximum charging rate. The maximum charging rate must be determined as specified in paragraphs (10)(a)(A) and (B) of this rule, as applicable: (A) For combustors that are designed based on heat capacity, the maximum charging rate must be calculated based on the maximum design heat input capacity of the unit and a heating value of 12,800 kilojoules per kilogram for combustors firing refuse-derived fuel and a heating value of 10,500 kilojoules per kilogram for combustors firing municipal solid waste that is not refuse-derived fuel. (B) For combustors that are not designed based on heat capacity, the maximum charging rate shall be the maximum design charging rate. (b) For batch feed municipal waste combustor units, municipal waste combustor unit capacity must be calculated as the maximum design amount of municipal solid waste that can be charged per batch multiplied by the maximum number of batches that could be processed in a 24-hour period. The maximum number of batches that could be processed in a 24-hour period is calculated as 24 hours divided by the design number of hours required to process one batch of municipal solid waste, and may include fractional batches (e.g., if one batch requires 16 hours, then 24/16, or 1.5 batches, could be combusted in a 24-hour period). For batch combustors that are designed based on heat capacity, the design heating value of 12,800 kilojoules per kilogram for combustors firing refuse-derived fuel and a heating value of 10,500 kilojoules per kilogram for combustors firing municipal solid waste that is not refuse-derived fuel must be used in calculating the municipal waste combustor unit capacity in megagrams per day of municipal solid waste. (11) The procedures specified in subsections (11)(a) through (c) of this rule must be used for determining compliance with the fugitive ash emission limit under OAR 340-0230-0335. (a) EPA Reference Method 22 must be used for determining compliance with the fugitive ash emission limit under OAR 340-0230-0335. The minimum observation time must be a series of three 1-hour observations. The observation period must include times when the facility is transferring ash from the municipal waste combustor unit to the area where ash is stored or loaded into containers or trucks. (b) The average duration of visible emissions per hour must be calculated from the three 1-hour observations. The average must be used to determine compliance with OAR 340-0230-0335. (c) The owner or operator of an affected facility must conduct a performance test for fugitive ash emissions on a calendar year basis (no less than 9 calendar months and no more than 15 months following the previous performance test; and must complete five performance tests in each 5-year period). (12) The owner or operator of an affected facility where activated carbon injection is used to comply with the mercury emission limit under OAR 340-230-0310(3)(c), the dioxin/furan emission limits under OAR 340-230-0310(6), or the dioxin/furan emission level specified in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule must follow the procedures specified in subsections (12)(a) through (d) of this rule. (a) During the performance tests for dioxins/furans and mercury, as applicable, the owner or operator must estimate an average carbon mass feed rate based on carbon injection system operating parameters such as the screw feeder speed, hopper volume, hopper refill frequency, or other parameters appropriate to the feed system being employed, as specified in paragraphs (12)(a)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) An average carbon mass feed rate in kilograms per hour or pounds per hour must be estimated during each performance test for mercury emissions. (B) An average carbon mass feed rate in kilograms per hour or pounds per hour must be estimated during each performance test for dioxin/furan emissions, if applicable. If a subsequent dioxin/furan performance test is being performed on only one affected facility at the MWC plant, as provided in paragraph (7)(d)(C) of this rule, the owner or operator may elect to apply the same estimated average carbon mass feed rate from the tested facility for all the similarly designed and operated affected facilities at the MWC plant. (b) During operation of the affected facility, the carbon injection system operating parameter(s) that are the primary indicator(s) of the carbon mass feed rate (e.g., screw feeder setting) must be averaged over a block 8-hour period, and the 8-hour average must equal or exceed the level(s) documented during the performance tests specified under paragraphs (12)(a)(A) and (B) of this rule, except as specified in paragraphs (12)(b)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) During the annual dioxin/furan or mercury performance test and the 2 weeks preceding the annual dioxin/furan or mercury performance test, no limit is applicable for average mass carbon feed rate if the provisions of paragraph (12)(b)(B) of this rule are met. (B) The limit for average mass carbon feed rate may be waived in accordance with permission granted by the Administrator for the purpose of evaluating system performance, testing new technology or control technologies, diagnostic testing, or related activities for the purpose of improving facility performance or advancing the state-of-the-art for controlling facility emissions. (c) The owner or operator must estimate the total carbon usage of the plant (kilograms or pounds) for each calendar quarter by two independent methods, according to the procedures in paragraphs (12)(c)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) The weight of carbon delivered to the plant. (B) Estimate the average carbon mass feed rate in kilograms per hour or pounds per hour for each hour of operation for each affected facility based on the parameters specified under subsection (12)(a) of this rule, and sum the results for all affected facilities at the plant for the total number of hours of operation during the calendar quarter. (d) Pneumatic injection pressure or other carbon injection system operational indicator must be used to provide additional verification of proper carbon injection system operation. The operational indicator must provide an instantaneous visual and/or audible alarm to alert the operator of a potential interruption in the carbon feed that would not normally be indicated by direct monitoring of carbon mass feed rate (e.g., continuous weight loss feeder) or monitoring of the carbon system operating parameter(s) that are the indicator(s) of carbon mass feed rate (e.g., screw feeder speed). The carbon injection system operational indicator used to provide additional verification of carbon injection system operation, including basis for selecting the indicator and operator response to the indicator alarm, must be included in subsection (5)(f) of this rule of the site-specific operating manual required under OAR 340-230-0330(4). (13) In place of periodic manual testing of mercury, cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride with EPA Reference Method 26, 26A, 29, or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 (as applicable), affected facilities may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for monitoring emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system. The option to use a continuous emission monitoring system for mercury takes effect on the date of approval of the site-specific monitoring plan required in subsection (13)(m) of this rule and section (14) of this rule. The option to use a continuous emission monitoring system for cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride takes effect on the date a final performance specification applicable to cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride monitor is published in the Federal Register or the date of approval of the site-specific monitoring plan required in subsection (13)(m) of this rule and section (14) of this rule. The owner or operator of an affected facility who elects to continuously monitor emissions instead of conducting manual performance testing must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system and must comply with the requirements in subsections (13)(a) through (n) of this rule. (a) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before starting use of the system. (b) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before stopping use of the system. (c) The monitor must be installed, evaluated, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.13. (d) The initial performance evaluation must be completed no later than 180 days after the date of initial startup of the affected facility, as specified under 40 CFR 60.8 or within 180 days of notification to the Administrator and the Department of use of the continuous monitoring system if the owner or operator was previously determining compliance by EPA Reference Method 26, 26A, 29, or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 (as applicable) performance tests, whichever is later. (e) The owner or operator may request that compliance with the emission limits be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (f) The owner or operator must conduct an initial performance test for emissions as required under 40 CFR 60.8. Compliance with the emission limits must be determined by using the continuous emission monitoring system specified in section (13) of this rule to measure emissions and calculating a 24-hour block arithmetic average emission concentration using EPA Reference Method 19, section 12.4.1. (g) Compliance with the emission limits must be determined based on the 24-hour daily (block) average of the hourly arithmetic average emission concentrations using continuous emission monitoring system outlet data. (h) Beginning on April 28, 2008 for mercury and on the date two years after final performance specifications for cadmium, lead or hydrogen chloride monitors are published in the Federal Register or the date two years after approval of a site-specific monitoring plan, valid continuous monitoring system hourly averages must be obtained as specified in paragraphs (13)(h)(A) and (B) of this rule for at least 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (A) At least two data points per hour must be used to calculate each 1-hour arithmetic average. (B) Each 1-hour arithmetic average must be corrected to 7 percent oxygen on an hourly basis using the 1-hour arithmetic average of the oxygen (or carbon dioxide) continuous emission monitoring system data. (i) The 1-hour arithmetic averages required under subsection (13)(g) of this rule must be expressed in micrograms per dry standard cubic meter for mercury, cadmium, lead and parts per million dry volume for hydrogen chloride corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis) and must be used to calculate the 24-hour daily arithmetic (block) average emission concentrations. The 1-hour arithmetic averages must be calculated using the data points required under 40 CFR 60.13(e)(2). (j) All valid continuous emission monitoring system data must be used in calculating average emission concentrations even if the minimum continuous emission monitoring system data requirements of subsection (13)(h) of this rule are not met. (k) The continuous emission monitoring system for mercury must be operated according to Performance Specification 12A in 40 CFR part 60 appendix B or the approved site-specific monitoring plan. (l) During each relative accuracy test run of the continuous emission monitoring system required by the performance specifications in subsection (13)(k) of this rule, mercury, cadmium, lead, hydrogen chloride, and oxygen (or carbon dioxide) data must be collected concurrently (or within a 30- to 60-minute period) by both the continuous emission monitors and the test methods specified in paragraphs (13)(l)(A) through (C) of this rule. (A) For mercury, cadmium, and lead, EPA Reference Method 29 or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 must be used. (B) For hydrogen chloride, EPA Reference Method 26 or 26A must be used. (C) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), EPA Reference Method 3, 3A, or 3B, as applicable must be used. (m) The owner or operator who elects to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for mercury, cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride must develop and implement a site-specific monitoring plan as specified in section (14) of this rule. The owner or operator who relies on a performance specification may refer to that document in addressing applicable procedures and criteria. (n) When emissions data are not obtained because of continuous emission monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, parametric monitoring data must be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by EPA. (14) The owner or operator who elects to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous emission monitoring system for mercury, cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride must develop and submit for approval by EPA, a site-specific mercury, cadmium, lead, or hydrogen chloride monitoring plan that addresses the elements and requirements in subsections (14)(a) through (g) of this rule. (a) Installation of the continuous emission monitoring system sampling probe or other interface at a measurement location relative to each affected process unit such that the measurement is representative of control of the exhaust emissions (e.g., on or downstream of the last control device). (b) Performance and equipment specifications for the sample interface, the pollutant concentration analyzer, and the data collection and reduction system. (c) Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria (e.g., calibrations). (d) Provisions for periods when the continuous emission monitoring system is out of control as described in paragraphs (14)(d)(A) through (C) of this rule. (A) A continuous emission monitoring system is out of control if either of the conditions in subparagraph (14)(d)(A)(i) or (ii) of this rule are met. (i) The zero (low-level), mid-level (if applicable), or high-level calibration drift exceeds two times the applicable calibration drift specification in the applicable performance specification or in the relevant standard; or (ii) The continuous emission monitoring system fails a performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative accuracy audit, relative accuracy test audit, or linearity test audit. (B) When the continuous emission monitoring system is out of control as defined in paragraph (14)(d)(A) of this rule, the owner or operator of the affected source must take the necessary corrective action and must repeat all necessary tests that indicate that the system is out of control. The owner or operator must take corrective action and conduct retesting until the performance requirements are below the applicable limits. The beginning of the out-of-control period is the hour the owner or operator conducts a performance check (e.g., calibration drift) that indicates an exceedance of the performance requirements established under this part. The end of the out-of-control period is the hour following the completion of corrective action and successful demonstration that the system is within the allowable limits. During the period the continuous emission monitoring system is out of control, recorded data shall not be used in data averages and calculations or to meet any data availability requirements in subsection (13)(h) of this rule. (C) The owner or operator of a continuous emission monitoring system that is out of control as defined in subsection (14)(d) of this rule must submit all information concerning out-of-control periods, including start and end dates and hours and descriptions of corrective actions taken in the annual or semiannual compliance reports required in OAR 340-230-0350(3) or (4). (e) Ongoing data quality assurance procedures for continuous emission monitoring systems as described in paragraphs (14)(e)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) Develop and implement a continuous emission monitoring system quality control program. As part of the quality control program, the owner or operator must develop and submit to EPA for approval, upon request, a site-specific performance evaluation test plan for the continuous emission monitoring system performance evaluation required in paragraph (14)(e)(B) of this rule. In addition, each quality control program must include, at a minimum, a written protocol that describes procedures for each of the operations described in subparagraphs (14)(e)(A)(i) through (vi) of this rule. (i) Initial and any subsequent calibration of the continuous emission monitoring system; (ii) Determination and adjustment of the calibration drift of the continuous emission monitoring system; (iii) Preventive maintenance of the continuous emission monitoring system, including spare parts inventory; (iv) Data recording, calculations, and reporting; (v) Accuracy audit procedures, including sampling and analysis methods; and (vi) Program of corrective action for a malfunctioning continuous emission monitoring system. (B) The performance evaluation test plan must include the evaluation program objectives, an evaluation program summary, the performance evaluation schedule, data quality objectives, and both an internal and external quality assurance program. Data quality objectives are the pre-evaluation expectations of precision, accuracy, and completeness of data. The internal quality assurance program must include, at a minimum, the activities planned by routine operators and analysts to provide an assessment of continuous emission monitoring system performance, for example, plans for relative accuracy testing using the appropriate reference method. The external quality assurance program must include, at a minimum, systems audits that include the opportunity for on-site evaluation by the Administrator or the Department of instrument calibration, data validation, sample logging, and documentation of quality control data and field maintenance activities. (f) Conduct a performance evaluation of each continuous emission monitoring system in accordance with the site-specific monitoring plan. (g) Operate and maintain the continuous emission monitoring system in continuous operation according to the site-specific monitoring plan. (15) In place of periodic manual testing of dioxin/furan or mercury with EPA Reference Method 23, 29, or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 (as applicable), the owner or operator of an affected facility may elect to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous automated sampling system for determining emissions discharged to the atmosphere. This option takes effect on the date a final performance specification applicable to such continuous automated sampling systems is published in the Federal Register or the date of approval of a site-specific monitoring plan. The owner or operator of an affected facility who elects to use a continuous automated sampling system to determine emissions instead of conducting manual performance testing must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate the sampling system and conduct analyses in compliance with the requirements specified in subsections (15)(a) through (k) of this rule. (a) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before starting use of the system. (b) Notify the Administrator and the Department one month before stopping use of the system. (c) The initial performance evaluation must be completed within 180 days of notification to the Administrator and the Department of use of the continuous monitoring system if the owner or operator was previously determining compliance by manual performance testing using Method 23, 29, or as an alternative ASTM D6784-02 (as applicable), whichever is later. (d) The owner or operator may request that compliance with the emission limits be determined using carbon dioxide measurements corrected to an equivalent of 7 percent oxygen. The relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels for the affected facility must be established as specified in subsection (2)(e) of this rule. (e) The owner or operator must conduct an initial performance test for emissions as required under 40 CFR 60.8. Compliance with the emission limits must be determined by using the continuous automated sampling system specified in section (15) of this rule to collect integrated samples and analyze emissions for the time period specified in paragraphs (15)(e)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) For dioxin/furan, the continuous automated sampling system must collect an integrated sample over each 2-week period. The collected sample must be analyzed using EPA Reference Method 23. (B) For mercury, the continuous automated sampling system must collect an integrated sample over each 24-hour daily period and the sample must be analyzed according to the applicable final performance specification or the approved site-specific monitoring plan required by section (16) of this rule. (f) Compliance with the emission limits must be determined based on 2-week emission concentrations for dioxin/furan and on the 24-hour daily emission concentrations for mercury using samples collected at the system outlet. The emission concentrations must be expressed in nanograms per dry standard cubic meter (total mass) for dioxin/furan and micrograms per dry standard cubic meter for mercury, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis). (g) Beginning on the date two years after the respective final performance specification for continuous automated sampling systems for dioxin/furan or mercury is published in the Federal Register or two years after approval of a site-specific monitoring plan, the continuous automated sampling system must be operated and collect emissions for at least 90 percent of the operating hours per calendar quarter and 95 percent of the operating hours per calendar year that the affected facility is combusting municipal solid waste. (h) All valid data must be used in calculating emission concentrations. (i) The continuous automated sampling system must be operated according to the final performance specification or the approved site-specific monitoring plan. (j) The owner or operator who elects to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous automated sampling system for dioxin/furan or mercury must develop and implement a site-specific monitoring plan as specified in section (16) of this rule. The owner or operator who relies on a performance specification may refer to that document in addressing applicable procedures and criteria. (k) When emissions data are not obtained because of continuous automated sampling system breakdowns, repairs, quality assurance checks, or adjustments, parametric monitoring data must be obtained by using other monitoring systems as approved by EPA. (16) The owner or operator who elects to install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous automated sampling system for dioxin/furan or mercury must develop and submit for approval by EPA, a site-specific monitoring plan that has sufficient detail to assure the validity of the continuous automated sampling system data and that addresses the elements and requirements in subsections (16)(a) through (g) of this rule. (a) Installation of the continuous automated sampling system sampling probe or other interface at a measurement location relative to each affected process unit such that the measurement is representative of control of the exhaust emissions (e.g., on or downstream of the last control device). (b) Performance and equipment specifications for the sample interface, the pollutant concentration analytical method, and the data collection system. (c) Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria. (d) Provisions for periods when the continuous automated sampling system is malfunctioning or is out of control as described in paragraphs (16)(d)(A) through (C) of this rule. (A) The site-specific monitoring plan must identify criteria for determining that the continuous automated sampling system is out of control. This includes periods when the sampling system is not collecting a representative sample or is malfunctioning, or when the analytical method does not meet site-specific quality criteria established in subsection (16)(e) of this rule. (B) When the continuous automated sampling system is out of control as defined in paragraph (16)(d)(A) of this rule, the owner or operator must take the necessary corrective action and must repeat all necessary tests that indicate that the system is out of control. The owner or operator must take corrective action and conduct retesting until the performance requirements are within the applicable limits. The out-of-control period includes all hours that the sampling system was not collecting a representative sample or was malfunctioning, or hours represented by a sample for which the analysis did not meet the relevant quality criteria. Emissions data obtained during an out-of-control period shall not be used in determining compliance with the emission limits or to meet any data availability requirements in subsection (15)(h) of this rule. (C) The owner or operator of a continuous automated sampling system that is out of control as defined in subsection (16)(d) of this rule must submit all information concerning out-of-control periods, including start and end dates and hours and descriptions of corrective actions taken in the annual or semiannual compliance reports required in OAR 340-230-0350(3) or (4). (e) Ongoing data quality assurance procedures for continuous automated sampling systems as described in paragraphs (16)(e)(A) and (B) of this rule. (A) Develop and implement a continuous automated sampling system and analysis quality control program. As part of the quality control program, affected facilities must develop and submit to EPA for approval, upon request, a site-specific performance evaluation test plan for the continuous automated sampling system performance evaluation required in paragraph (16)(e)(B) of this rule. In addition, each quality control program must include, at a minimum, a written protocol that describes procedures for each of the operations described in subparagraphs (16)(e)(A)(i) through (vii) of this rule. (i) Correct placement, installation of the continuous automated sampling system such that the system is collecting a representative sample of gas; (ii) Initial and subsequent calibration of flow such that the sample collection rate of the continuous automated sampling system is known and verifiable; (iii) Procedures to assure representative (e.g., proportional or isokinetic) sampling; (iv) Preventive maintenance of the continuous automated sampling system, including spare parts inventory and procedures for cleaning equipment, replacing sample collection media, or other servicing at the end of each sample collection period; (v) Data recording and reporting, including an automated indicator and recording device to show when the continuous automated monitoring system is operating and collecting data and when it is not collecting data; (vi) Accuracy audit procedures for analytical methods; and (vii) Program of corrective action for a malfunctioning continuous automated sampling system. (B) The performance evaluation test plan must include the evaluation program objectives, an evaluation program summary, the performance evaluation schedule, data quality objectives, and both an internal and external quality assurance program. Data quality objectives are the pre-evaluation expectations of precision, accuracy, and completeness of data. The internal quality assurance program must include, at a minimum, the activities planned by routine operators and analysts to provide an assessment of continuous automated sampling system performance, for example, plans for relative accuracy testing using the appropriate reference method in subsection (15)(c) of this rule, and an assessment of quality of analysis results. The external quality assurance program must include, at a minimum, systems audits that include the opportunity for on-site evaluation by the Administrator or the Department of instrument calibration, data validation, sample logging, and documentation of quality control data and field maintenance activities. (f) Conduct a performance evaluation of each continuous automated sampling system in accordance with the site-specific monitoring plan. (g) Operate and maintain the continuous automated sampling system in continuous operation according to the site-specific monitoring plan. (17) Continuous monitoring for opacity, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and diluent gases (oxygen or carbon dioxide) must be conducted in accordance with the Department's Continuous Monitoring Manual and the specific requirements of this rule. If at any time there is a conflict between the Department's Continuous Monitoring Manual and the federal requirements contained in 40 CFR 60.13, Appendix B and Appendix F), the federal requirements must govern. [NOTE: The Department's Continuous Monitoring Manual is published at OAR 340-200-0035.] [NOTE: Referenced publications not attached below are available from the agency.] [NOTE: View a PDF of equations, EPA Performance Specifications, and EPA Procedures by clicking on "Tables" link below.] [NOTE: View a PDF of referenced EPA Methods by clicking on "Tables" link following OAR 340-230-8010.] [ED. NOTE: To view attachments referenced in rule text, click here to view rule.]